you're reading...

Kansas NCLB Flexibility Waiver: “We are getting closer and closer to being approved”

Art Credit: KC Education Enterprise | Photo & Frame Credit: 123rf stock images

“We are getting closer and closer to being approved” was the update members of the Kansas State Board of Education heard at their June meeting earlier this week. What they are waiting for is federal approval of their request for a waiver of the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB).

State Education Commissioner Diane DeBacker said she and her staff had been on a conference call with representatives of the U.S. Department of Education right before the state board meeting started. As a result of that conversation, she said, her impression was that there are still a few details of the waiver that need to be negotiated. However, she thought federal approval would soon be forthcoming.

“Right now we’re at the point where it’s probably going to be approved before we meet again,” DeBacker told the board.

Kansas and 26 other states (including Missouri) were among the second round of waiver applicants earlier this year. And 11 states applied in the first round. So far all first-round applicants and eight of those in the second have received approval. Kansas and Missouri, along with 16 other second-round applicants, received letters in April asking for revisions.

Since submitting their revised waiver application May 14, state department of education staff members have been negotiating with the U.S. Department of Education. Kansas has agreed to focus more on raising achievement of the lowest-performing groups of students. Currently under discussion are revisions to the required new teacher evaluation plan. But the state hasn’t been the only party to the discussion demonstrating its flexibility on these issues,  DeBacker said, indicating that there had been compromises on both sides.

U.S. Department of Education Officials, she said, “have been forced to crystallize what they really want and stand for and need.”

The issue of requiring more focus on lower-performing students prompted some discussion among state board members about whether flexibility waivers might end up being too much like the NCLB requirements they are designed to replace. One of those requirements is that all students in all schools achieve proficiency on state standardized tests by 2014, which is an impossible goal.

Board Member Walt Chappell, in particular, expressed concern about “setting schools up for failure again” by setting unreachable goals for “the hardest kids to teach.” He also wondered whether the federal government’s flexibility waiver offer would lead to meaningful education reform.

“None of this has anything to do with reform,” Chappell said. “It has to do with their fantasies, what they think might work.”

However, few of the other state board members appeared to share his concern, and state education department officials have permission to continue negotiating.

The Kansas State Board of Education meet Tuesday and Wednesday of this week in Topeka. Their next meeting will take place July 11-12.


Read our Twitter feed for more education news from local, regional and national sources:http://twitter.com/#!/JW_Martinez


Or you can subscribe to the daily KC Education Enterprise roundup of local, state and national education news on paper.li: http://paper.li/JW_Martinez/1322883462

About jwmartinez

JoLynne is a journalist and educator. She holds a bachelor's degree in journalism from the University of Kansas and a Master of Arts in Teaching from Park University and is certified to teach high school journalism and English. Former employment includes work for Cable News Network and the University of Missouri-Kansas City in addition to freelancing for clients such as the Kansas City Star and The Pitch.


One thought on “Kansas NCLB Flexibility Waiver: “We are getting closer and closer to being approved”

  1. Thank you for the update.

    Walt Chappell is the only school board member who understands asking for the waiver from NCLB will only create more onerous mandates for the state.

    If these board members think NCLB was bad, these waivers are NCLB on steroids. The board should be advocating for freedom from the Department of Education control. Now that’s something to celebrate. Not a waiver that creates more federal control and unfunded mandates.

    Whatever happened to common sense? These school board members advocating for this waiver need to be replaced.

    Posted by stlgretchen | June 13, 2012, 10:49 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Publisher & Editor

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 242 other followers

%d bloggers like this: